Jaipur Review - February 2004
[Visit the Information Page for this Restaurant]
The summary review is shown below.
Summary
The final reckoning is shown in the table below. Overall we rate it an OK 19.0 Taj Mahals which is 2 down on the last time we visited.
There seemed to be quite a variation in what members thought of the food. I would certainly rate the cuisine in this establishment and even some of the more critical members were heard to say "I've not tasted a bad dish"
Personally speaking I thought the food very good, in particular I enjoyed the lamb dishes which were characterised by large pieces that melted in your mouth.
Of course the problem that some of our members have with the Jaipur is the cost. I think Graeme has it summed up in this extract from his review which you read here:
You know that you will not pay less £25 per person - and that is somewhat reflected by how much you drink. It is the kind of place to take your most valued customer and should be the kind of place to take your loved one if you want more than just the food experience
| Item | Score |
| Location |
  |
| Ambience |
|
| Food |
|
| Service |
|
| Value for Money |
|
| Cleanliness |
|
| TOTAL | 19.0 |
Other Comments
Here is a selection of some of the other comments from the evening......
- Starters seemed a bit cold
- Nice freebie langoustine
- Very nice aubergine and cheese starter
- Good service helped by presence of TV crew
- Good nan bread
- Great presentation
- Mixed starter ok but a tad cold
- Long wait between starter and main course
- Onion bhajee very good
- Chick overcooked in Jalfrezi dish
- Nicely clad waitress!
- Service good but a long time to wait for food
- Food tasty to very tasty overall
- Enjoyed it plenty
We also visited the Jaipur in 2002. Click here to see that review.